Відео

There's a reason why a lot of artists sold there masters.

Ah yeah, I used MOTU Performer on a toadstool Mac when I was in high school.

Boeing "found things", but it seems as if they were FORCED TO LOOK. Shouldn't they have been looking for and solving problems before they had consequences and destroyed the company's reputation?? Do they have to be told to do their jobs?? These people don't belong anywhere near an airplane. =PC=

I no longer trust the airlines. Talk of single pilot operations... I rest my case. =PC=

Yeah, clearly it wouldn't replace everyone. But it replace a lot of people. If you write background music for media, you better find something else real quick because there aren't going to be a lot of people able to survive in that area. The average production music composer who just writes generic music is about to disappear for sure. BTW, Rick is THE man when it comes to all of this. He's very open minded and knowledgeable. And your Coldfusion channel is by far one of the best UA-cam channels I've seen! very well produced and researched. I'm a big fan.

One thing that many people keep forgetting about AI it's the fact that it never sleeps. It progresses every minute of the time we spend doing anything else. Ten years from now this world will be totally different. Especially our perceptions. We could be very easily influenced by someone /something that successful. Sad but real.

What about NEVER SAY NEVER? 😊 I MADE A VIDEO A FEW YEARS AGO ABOUT THE AI ripping the born skills from everyone soon, which will be terrible for the mental health of those people and even for everyone else. Imagine what will happen when our expectations will so high, even AI won't be able to provide us with new content that fast? What then? I am talking 20 years from now max. No laws will be able to stop it now so.... 😮😢

It still happened and caused by the greed of the top people and investors. It is all to do with GREED nothing else so stop making excuses. people do not want to fly with boeing. GREED GREED

What defines quality in music? ...IMO human heart and soul.... the generator of emotion that drives our creativity comes from the heart of God of creation through us.. the God of creation ... not machines... having a soul is something AI doesn't have... it cant be reproduced.... the end product or creative piece is missing the most important ingredient of all... heart and soul ... code can never be written and reproduced by a machine.... Its just a somewhat tasty neuronal unhealthy treat thats probably about as healthy as GMO or synthetic foods are excellent for human health... we create to share with other humans... human to human connection is powerful and healthy... why would anyone ever want to replace that?

What people dont undestand by saying they will still play their instrument or learn to sing even with AI.... Is why the next generation will do it ? IF you cant make any money OUT of it ANY CARRER because your proffesion has been completely devalued by machine why are you gonna spend your life and energy to do it ?like agriculture has been or handcrafting ? I saw less and less kids that want to learn an instrument nowaday more than ever in human history and pretty soon will be the same with real singing and even lyrics making has AI make cheaper and quicker Poem than everyone of us by just stealing us and art history data directly and play "random" button ...that basicly what Ai does... Playing instrument or singing will be irrelevant the same has going fishing in your lake or growing vegetables in your garden for the next future...a small porcentaje of population yes and not a necesity just a hobby... THE PROFESSION IS DEAD ...TECH COMPANY JUST KILLED IT AND THEY ARE LAUGHING AT US LIKE PSYCHOPATH THEY ARE...THE TRUTH HAS TO BE SAID Big part of the population gonna be poor jobless...for just a few CEO tech beings rich as fuccj... Paradox capitalisme Will prefer die to see this with my own eyes

I hope and wait to see nothing becomes a disrupter in tech and fill the void

I love making and listening to music so i'm going to keep pushing myself to become a better writer and player and try to learn everything there is to know about the art of mixing and mastering. I don't want AI to take away any of the creative experience from me. If we give away our art creation to the machines and our culture and the things which make us human what will we be left with?

I think becoming a professional musician will become more difficult as it will be for sound engineering etc. Becoming wealthy from being a musician will be even more remote, but making music for enjoyment of doing it yourself will not disappear, and performing live will remain a human emotional enterprise.

That’s a different discussion. The fact that music or any other art form made by an AI-tool can be as pleasing as human art piece. The trust part comes in when AI generate art is marketed as human generated. But that would be plain fraud. Fraud exists as long humans exist.

Imagine a dj prompting in real time, you see the prompt " horse laser on ice planet" you have no idea what that sounds like. Suddenly to the composition you are already hearing a realistic sound you have never heard before is added. I would attend that concert. For classical music could be something like monet on acid idk hahaha

WARNING TO VIEWERS: In every legal dispute/issue, one lawyer will be proven wrong. This lawyer is often correct in this video but there are significant errors. Also, there is no word “copyrightable”. Which he erroneously uses repeatedly. The word is not “copywrite”. Many lay people get this wrong. A lawyer shouldn’t, especially one self-proclaimed as an expert in a public video. A copyright is a noun, not a verb. It is a noun like the word “deed”. You cannot say “deedable” (unless you are unschooled). AI will be deemed an “act of nature”. An act of nature cannot copyright or patent. That is the answer he should have given. As to why scraping (the interviewee says “ingesting”) of prior works is not infringement, it is not, as he argues, based on a fair use defense, but because nothing scraped is substantially similar to the AI product, nor compromises the commerciality of the original work claimed to have been copied.

You can’t copyright a voice. He should know better, being held out as an expert. Generally, the interview is otherwise informative.

Ai does not need to replace musicians. It will simply create its own market and take over (some) of the services (esp with repetitive tasks)that musicians provide for especially a certain demographic

mad respect for addressing the rabbithoIe case.

RICK, ETC. YOU GOT IT ALL WRONG. "Why AI Can Never Truly Replace All Musicians" is just LOOKING at the surface problem, when what is required is SEEING the much more foreboding Metaproblem: If AI continues hurtling towards an inevitable worst-case scenario, the myopic, knee-jerk, compromised statement that "ALL MUSICIANS WILL NOT REPLACED" can be true while at the same time... THERE WILL ONLY BE ONE MUSICIAN OF MUSICIANS STANDING, AND THAT WILL BE AI. But this is only scratching the surface of the tip of a melting iceberg, for the same AI may, by that time, also replicate its successful replacement of all musicians except itself across every sphere of human existence to the point that what was once THE TRAGIC DAY THE MUSIC DIED soon becomes THE DAY WHERE AI IS THE LAST MAN STANDING... NOW GO WRITE-RECORD-PROMOTE-PUBLISH A HUMANITY-PLANET-SAVING HIT SONG AND STAGE-MAKE A MUSICAL, MOVIE, TV SHOW, THEME PARK, ETC. ABOUT THIS AND BE A FORCE-MULTIPLIER AND DIFFERENCE MAKER FOR "PAUSING AI" WHILE WE CAN AND BEFORE IT'S TOO LATE FOR US ALL! pauseai.info/xrisk

Suno and Udio are 100 percent illegal.. it's only time til it's shut down.

5:31 "The first programs were Performer and Composer" -- SAME HERE! I loved Performer and started on it about 1991 until the mid 2000's. Ran them on my Macbook 185 and others Apple computers. I still have my Yamaha and MOTU Synths.

Synthetic transhumans like synthetic transhuman muzak.

Yes it is you can 1000-2000 people and pages and only receive 400 followers. While those stuff you follow receive a thousand to a hundred thousand for posting pornographic images or videos, modelling sexy pictures or videos, being celebrities or business men/women, politicians, and OF models/poenstars. Women that have OF accounts receive thousands of dollars from people they call ‘Simps ow daddies’ on the internet. You only receive 400 followers for stuff you follow and reteeet of girls in provocative poses and clothing. It’s a waster of time, too many fake people, too much porn, too little personality, too much competition to become popular and SM famous, tweeting is basically stupid, Elon Musk is sitting on rust bucket that’s going to explode one day(as Twitter is not worth as much as he bought 2-4 years ago), there’s too many bots, you’re better off deactivating your account or find someone that’s good with social media business skills(someone that can excellerste your account to stat level which can cost money. It’s also an overrated skill for businesses today), most niche hashtags are click baits, most people only started accounts for OnlyFans to follow girls with thousands of followers(which girls are more likely to be influencers and make more money on social media than men via X,I sta, OF, and Facebook). Women make more money in hospitalit, healthcare, and sales where there are commission or tipping. Twitter is better to be deleted as it is a waste of time energy and mentality. It is better to create your own business site than waste your life on social media just complaining why you didn’t ad much followers as these girls doing OnlyFans pornography and prostitution which should be banned or illegal. Despite having crushes on the models they create sexually explicit material for money(a way of prostitution without sleeping eiiyh married men or the men paying for these girls rent, plastic surgeries, inessentials for selfish desires of Me Me MeMy Happiness of appearance than self care of mentality or spirituality. Personally I don’t care about followers as the Dolo Lama receives less followers on social media than the Kardashians and any Gor rich quick influencers. Shallowness and looks more likely gain fame than maturity and a person’s psyche. Likes and follows and followers are only oof 2010s and 20s than 1990s and 2000s. Facebook wasn’t always about about likes and friend requests when it started nor flash games. MySpace and Friendster weren’t about having serveral friends and likes but shares and mini comments. They weren’t about likes and follows/followers nor.was Twitter originally about likes and follows/followers. UA-cam wasn’t about followers and likes but stsrs and views. No subscribes and comments or bell icon. MSN Messenger Hotmail AIM and Google Groups weren’t about gaining followers like Snapchat, mosern Teitrer/X, Instagram, and OnlyFans. Nor was there subscriptions for anything but newspapers and magazines on the 2990d and 2000s. I think the world would be better off without X and OnlyFans as they should be either banned or illegal or OF should have another porn ban. Peon addictions and social media addictions ruin our brain chemistry. Especially modern day social media thst’s gone popular since 2011/13 like modern day Twitter/X, Snapchat, Insta, TikTok, and porn giant OF(really majority of websites on OF are pornography or pornographic material). Social media social like X and OF almost ruined my completely.

I respect Rick a lot but this was a masterful lesson on how not to answer questions straight and honestly. You gotta understand that Rick's already made. He's set and financially secured, so of course he is not "worried", and the same goes for all artists who already have a name to themselves and enough financial assets to be able to spout any optimistic opinion about this matter. The reality is it is already insanely difficult to make a living as a musician. This new tech will only put the final nail in the coffin of an already evident trend. Also, some of the questions asked were very imprecise. "Will AI eventually replace all musicians?" Man, that's a very poor question. Of course not. Not all musicians will die out. Watchmakers did not die out entirely neither, but how many people live off of creating luxury mechanical clocks in this day?

As always. This podcast deserves so much more attention

Great description of the MCAS issue and in general an informative video

This is amazing content. Love coffee and haven’t seen much of your guys content but will def check it out!! Thanks for putting this together and sharing

Great interview and discussion. Thanks guys!

Consumers will use AI to create their own music/playlists, no (artists, music gear, producers, record labels, streaming services, etc.) middlemen needed.

Live music in small venues, please...

Songwriters who use ai will create more songs mare quickly but it's still up to the ear to make a determination if it sounds good.

Great. It’s an AI voiceover too. 🤔

This is the final nail in the coffin. Near total devaluation of music. Stock music is dead, almost overnight. Musicians were already getting fleeced and barely making ends meet playing live. This has been well documented over the last decade. How will we know when something is made solely by a human? We won’t know and eventually we won’t care and there goes a part of our collective culture. This is total thievery and we need legislation yesterday. This should be a much bigger story in the media.

30:03 _"…Van Gogh style…"_ Funny that you mentioned Van Gogh. Last year I created 4 videos about Van Gogh's journey through the northern part of The Netherlands: The province of Drenthe. I created the script, as a monologue, hearing his thought. But thought it would be nice to have the narration be in the style of Vincent's letters. So, after many ChatGPT iterations, I got the video's in that style. I was basically the director of what AI was generating. Compilation example of the video: ua-cam.com/video/hiQVv5zdPjk/v-deo.html The video is in Dutch. But the generated English captions are quite spot _(for about 90%)_ on! Just turn them on with the cog wheel in YT Fun facts: The train scenes are shot in old trains with a large green-screen outside. The landscape, to replace the green-screen, is shot with my iPhone, while driving through the landscape where I filmed om that road at 7:49At 7:04 is the room where Vincent actually lived. At 9:47 the music is not from my usual Artlist Stock Library, but created by my girlfriend's gitarist "Gijs Kos". It hints to Don McLean's "Vincent", as you can hear at the end of the track. It kinda has the melody of the musical phrase "starry, starry night". It would take too many prompts to polish that that last track into something usable. AI can be a very handy tool. But it only mimics the art of a real artist!

There's already some great AI songs on the channel Obscurest Vynil!

Regarding MCAS, I did not know that the 767 tanker variant incorporated an MCAS system. That was news to me. Thank you for that interesting tidbit of information!

Electrically powered aircraft for basic pilot training are limited in power DURATION, not so much in RANGE considerations.

Agree or not carl pei is the best tech ceo ever because he is very open and honest than any other tech ceo's none is even close

He is so done; old guy not needed anymore.

Great interview! Love the thought experiment such as jamming live to AI generated tracks. I am going to try this! I already Jam to loops,, AI tracks the next step for me!

AI is the most disrespectful exploitation machine of anything of real value. Why should a real artist like that? It's so incredibly boring and cheap - It’s so sad 😢

Considering the knowledge and experience of participants in the podcast, I was hoping for a more comprehensive conversation about the impact of AI on music, art and creativity. I also expected a deeper comment from Rick Beato. For someone whose entire channel is based on music technology, music theory, musical creativity and musicianship, it seems like he looked at AI from a somehow smaller perspective. Current GenAI and LLM based systems marketed as AI are not the same as DAWs, autotune, sampling or loops etc., there is a fundamental mistake there. Since he has closely observed the technical development of music technology for years, he has evaluated the current role of AI very limitedly, seeing it as a "new tool". This is the perspective of almost all AI supporters as well; “a new tool”. In a way, it is, but the technology currently marketed as AI is like a Pandora's box. This technology, which will obviously lead to huge socioeconomic changes, is actually a perfect weapon for transferring wealth in the hands of venture capitalists, billionaire tech capitalists and mighty tech companies. On the other hand, in addition to the legality of the data sets used in the AI training , copyright, consent and the ethics of AI, when we look at the basis of this technology, it is actually open to debate whether it is really an "AI" or not. But these aside; The main problem with these GenAI technologies is that it is a system that produces results by reducing creativity to the products of very complex probability distributions based on billions of parameters and codes defined only by a set of possible indicators. What is the impact of such a technology on the cultural evolution of humanity and human cognitive abilities? What concrete impact will it have on abstract concepts such as music and art, which are actually tied to real human experience? I'd love to hear what they think about this. Beato is someone who has closely followed the technological developments in the field of music and their impact on music. He occasionally makes Spotify top ten reviews and complains about the poor musical quality of new hits. So, the effect of all these technological developments on music is not always positive. As he said, if there will be separate "AI music hits" lists in 2 years, I am very curious how he will evaluate them.

Just put out a single called Slight Infractions that is my lyrics with Ai music. You can find it on my page among human performances too.

19:50 - i thought he was going to say Billie A.I.lish

we're screwed kids. maybe small live shows will endure, but large scale work is going to go away.

Attn: Barry Manilow. New lyrics have been assigned. I write the code that make the whole world sing I write the code of love and special things I write the code that make the young girls cry I write the code that writes the songs

1858: "Why a train can never really replace a horse&carriage." 1898: "Why an automobile can never really replace a horse." 1928: " Why an airplane can never really replace an oceanliner." 1988: "Why computer games can never really replace real world games."

Something is off with his video feed. Looks like he is AI-generated.